menu

Compared

Aristotelian virtue ethics versus Cynicism

Both say a good life is a life of virtue that has to be practised. Aristotle roots virtue in a community and its upbringing, and in having some good things around you. The Cynics stepped out of customs and held that virtue is enough.

What they share

Both hold that a good life is a life of virtue, and that being good takes training and practice, not only knowing what is right. Both also treat reason as the thing that makes a human life go well.

Where they differ

  • The person and the community. For Aristotle a human being can only thrive in a political community, and fellow citizens help a person become good. The Cynics kept away from rulers and the ordinary political game in order to stay self-sufficient, though Diogenes is reported to have called himself a citizen of the world.
  • Convention and upbringing. Aristotle starts from upbringing and habit within a community, and holds that even a good community needs laws. The Cynics made nature, not convention, the standard. They mocked social customs openly and wanted them replaced by a life in line with reason and nature.
  • Wealth and luck. Aristotle says living well takes some good fortune and some means, because virtuous activity is held back without enough of them. The Cynics rejected wealth, power and fame as worthless, and held that a poor, virtuous and self-sufficient life is the better one.

A question that separates them

  • Where does goodness grow? “People become good inside a community, and the community comes first” against “A person should step out of the community’s customs and stand on their own”. The first is Aristotle’s and the second is the Cynics’.
  • What should we do with inherited customs? “Learn from the customs and upbringing that have lasted” against “Question the customs and live by nature, even if it looks shameless”. The first is Aristotle’s.
  • Is virtue enough? “A good life needs some luck and some means as well as virtue” against “Virtue is enough, and wealth and fame are worth nothing”. The first is Aristotle’s.

Written by epchē in our own words, and checked against independent sources on 9 October 2026. The sources are listed below.

Read each on its own

Sources we used

Where do you stand? Take the walk

Something wrong or missing on this page? Tell us.